Patients’ maximum acceptable waiting time for cataract surgery: a comparison at two time-points 7 years apart

10Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the maximum acceptable waiting time (MAWT) of cataract patients and assess the determinants of their perception of MAWT at two time-points 7 years apart. Methods: In 2007 (prior to the transformation of our cataract service to a day case unit) and 2014, 500 consecutive patients with cataract were asked to fill in a preoperative questionnaire addressing their MAWT to undergo cataract surgery. The patients’ visual impairment (VF-14 score), education and social status were evaluated. Results: The mean MAWT was 3.2 months in both periods, whereas the actual waiting time decreased significantly by 1.7 months (p < 0.001). Patients who had self-noted visual impairment were nearly four times (p < 0.001) more likely to accept only an MAWT of <3 months in 2007. In both periods, patients with a VF-14 score lower than the mean were more likely to accept a shorter MAWT (p = 0.002 and p = 0.034). Living together with children or having relatives close by was associated with a greater acceptance of an MAWT longer than 3 months (p = 0.002 and p = 0.023). Conclusion: Reducing the actual mean waiting time had no impact on the mean MAWT. Patients with poor tolerance of waiting had greater self-reported difficulty with vision. Social support was also a strong predictor from the patients’ perspective. The VF-14 score had a greater impact than clinical visual acuity (VA) testing. Considering the implementation of standards for waiting lists, objective criteria to guarantee a transparent system should be taken into account.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weingessel, B., Wahl, M., & Vécsei-Marlovits, P. V. (2018). Patients’ maximum acceptable waiting time for cataract surgery: a comparison at two time-points 7 years apart. Acta Ophthalmologica, 96(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13439

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free