Flooding tolerance of spelt (Triticum spelta L.) compared to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) - A physiological and genetic approach

30Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In marginal, agroclimatic zones, yield is often affected by flooding, but the effect is much less for winter spelt (Triticum spelta L.) than for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). This study evaluates the reaction of a wheat x spelt population (F5 RILs of Forno x Oberkulmer) to flooding stress in the early phase of germination. Lines with greater tolerance to 48 h flooding just after imbibition showed less electrolyte leakage (r = -0.79) indicating greater membrane integrity and better survival. Five QTL explaining 40.6% of the phenotypic variance for survival to flooding were found, and localized on the chromosomes 2B, 3B, 5A, and 7S. The tolerance to 48 h flooding four days after sowing was best correlated with the mean germination time (r = 0.8), indicating that the plants with a fast coleoptile growth during flooding are less susceptible to flooding. Ten QTL were found for seedling growth index after flooding explaining 35.5% of the phenotypic variance. They were localized on chromosomes 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A, 4B, 5A, 5B, 6A, and 7S. Standard varieties of spelt and wheat showed the same tolerance characteristics. The possibility to use marker assisted selection for flooding tolerance is discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

St. Burgos, M., Messmer, M. M., Stamp, P., & Schmid, J. E. (2001). Flooding tolerance of spelt (Triticum spelta L.) compared to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) - A physiological and genetic approach. Euphytica, 122(2), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012945902299

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free