Major powers and the contested evolution of a responsibility to protect

64Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The debate about a responsibility to protect (R2P) people from mass atrocities goes to the heart of current changes in the world. Coinciding with the shift of power and influence away from the West, its nascent and contested evolution as a norm has become a crucial arena in which fundamental conflicts about the future global order play out—far beyond simplistic dichotomies between ‘North’ and ‘South’ or ‘West’ and ‘Rest’. This special issue analyses how seven major powers engaged with these struggles over sovereignty and responsibility, universalism and exceptionalism, hypocrisy and selectivity. Emerging from a globally collaborative research group on ‘Global Norm Evolution and the Responsibility to Protect’, the papers pursue three goals: to study major powers’ normative foreign policies in their historical, institutional and cultural background, to bring the role of major powers back into the analysis of norm development and to expand on the standard narrative about the evolution of ‘R2P’ by embedding it in a more global, less Western-centric context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rotmann, P., Kurtz, G., & Brockmeier, S. (2014, August 1). Major powers and the contested evolution of a responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security and Development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.930592

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free