Stereotypes of social groups in mainland china in terms of warmth and competence: evidence from a large undergraduate sample

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) has been validated in multiple countries and regions. However, previous validation studies in China have been limited by small sample size. The current research increased the sample size (n = 184 in the pilot study; n1 = 1315 and n2 = 268 in the formal study) to validate the SCM in mainland China in study 1. Supporting the SCM, 41 social groups were clustered into four quadrants based on warmth and competence dimensions. 35 of the 41 target groups (85.37%) receive ambivalent stereotype. Perceived warmth and competence were positively correlated (r = 0.585, p < 0.001). Status and competence were positively related (r = 0.81, p < 0.001), and competition and warmth were negatively related (r = −0.77, p < 0.001). In addition, 24 typical social groups were selected and a list of stereotype words for these groups was developed in study 2 (n1 = 48, n2 = 52). The implications of the emerging social groups and the applications of this stereotype word list are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ji, Z., Yang, Y., Fan, X., Wang, Y., Xu, Q., & Chen, Q. W. (2021). Stereotypes of social groups in mainland china in terms of warmth and competence: evidence from a large undergraduate sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073559

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free