Integration of patient and clinician narratives into systematic reviews: An applied proof of concept

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Health systems currently underutilize systematic reviews. Here, we describe a proof of concept project designed to augment the standard systematic review process by presenting qualitative information as a companion to a review on deprescribing interventions. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with Veterans Health Administration clinicians and Veterans to describe first-hand experiences of engaging in the deprescribing process. Qualitative findings were incorporated into an interactive, web-based product designed to supplement the systematic review report. Preliminary evaluation suggests that integration of narratives as a companion to systematic reviews is of interest to frontline clinicians, researchers, and health system administrators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christensen, V., Clark, K., Tallett, S., Kenyon, E. A., & Dobscha, S. K. (2021). Integration of patient and clinician narratives into systematic reviews: An applied proof of concept. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free