Characterization of intervertebral disc changes in asymptomatic individuals with distinct physical activity histories using three different quantitative MRI techniques

12Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

(1) Background: Assessments of intervertebral disc (IVD) changes, and IVD tissue adaptations due to physical activity, for example, remains challenging. Newer magnetic resonance imaging techniques can quantify detailed features of the IVD, where T2-mapping and T2-weighted (T2w) and Dixon imaging are potential candidates. Yet, their relative utility has not been examined. The performances of these techniques were investigated to characterize IVD differences in asymptomatic individuals with distinct physical activity histories. (2) Methods: In total, 101 participants (54 women) aged 25–35 years with distinct physical activity histories but without histories of spinal disease were included. T11/12 to L5/S1 IVDs were examined with sagittal T2-mapping, T2w and Dixon imaging. (3) Results: T2-mapping differentiated Pfirrmann grade-1 from all other grades (p < 0.001). Most importantly, T2-mapping was able to characterize IVD differences in individuals with different training histories (p < 0.005). Dixon displayed weak correlations with the Pfirrmann scale, but presented significantly higher water content in the IVDs of the long-distance runners (p < 0.005). (4) Conclusions: Findings suggested that T2-mapping best reflects IVD differences in asymptomatic individuals with distinct physical activity histories changes. Dixon characterized new aspects of IVD, probably associated with IVD hypertrophy. This complementary information may help us to better understand the biological function of the disc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belavy, D. L., Brisby, H., Douglas, B., Hebelka, H., Quittner, M. J., Owen, P. J., … Lagerstrand, K. M. (2020). Characterization of intervertebral disc changes in asymptomatic individuals with distinct physical activity histories using three different quantitative MRI techniques. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061841

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free