Abstract
Objective: To compare post-procedural outcomes of trans-catheter valve replacement (TAVR) among safety-net (SNH) and non-safety net hospitals (non-SNH). Background: SNH treat a large population of un-insured and low income patients; prior studies report worse outcome at these centers. Results of TAVR at these centers is limited. Methods: Adults undergoing TAVR at hospitals in the US participating in the National In-patient sample (NIS) database from January 2014 to December 2015 were included. A 1:1 propensity-matched cohort of patients operated at SNH and non-SNH institutions was analyzed, on the basis of 16 demographic and clinical co-variates. Main outcome was all-cause post-procedural mortality. Secondary outcomes included stroke, acute kidney injury and length of post-operative stay. Results: Between 2014 and 2015, 41,410 patients (mean age 80 ± 0.11 years, 46% female) underwent TAVR at 731 centers; 6,996 (16.80%) procedures were performed at SNH comprising 135/731 (18.4%) of all centers performing TAVR. SNH patients were more likely to be female (49% vs. 46%, p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sheikh, M. A., Deo, S. V., Riaz, H., Raza, S., Altarabsheh, S. E., Wilson, B., … Markowitz, A. H. (2021). Safety-net hospitals versus non-safety centers and clinical outcomes after trans-catheter aortic valve replacement. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 97(3), E425–E430. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29123
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.