Motive Element in Planed Murder Criminal Act According to Article 340 KUHP

  • Irawadi L
  • Rodliyah
  • Natsir M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research is conducted to find out and analyse the implementation of criminal law in motive element of planed murder perpetrator as well as to find out and analyse the vindication of motive of planed murder perpertator by applying normative legal research method. Aimed to analyze the implementation of positive law norms under statute, case and historical, comparative and conceptual approach. Research result shown that implementation of Article 340 KUHP depends on judge’s point of view poured in his legal considerations. The point of view can be Monistic where motive is not a significance consideration as long as the crime lead to certain legal consequences or dualistic where motive is important to consider in order to determine perpetrator’s grade of guilt (psychologically) since dualistis point of view differentiate between objective element and subjective element (guilt element). To proof that there is motive element in a planed murder, Judge shall apply vindication principle used in Indonesia’s criminal law procedure according to Article 184 KUHP and law number 48 of 2009 concerning judiciary power.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Irawadi, L., Rodliyah, & Natsir, M. (2019). Motive Element in Planed Murder Criminal Act According to Article 340 KUHP. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v7i11.lla01

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free