Advantages and disadvantages of multi-axis intraoperative angiography unit for percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine

13Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyzed clinical usefulness of the high resolution imaging system in a hybrid operation room (OR) for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A total of 17 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis between February 2014 and August 2016 were included. Multi-axis imaging system in a hybrid OR was used in 12 patients (hybrid OR group); the conventional C-arm fluoroscopy, in 5 patients (C-arm group). The time to confirm the first percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) angle (hybrid OR, 80 vs C-arm, 249 s; P = 0.0026) and the second to the last PPS angle (77 vs 90 s; P = 0.040) were shorter in the hybrid OR group. Placement accuracy was higher in the hybrid OR group (88.0 vs 59.1%; P = 0.010). Irradiation dose was significantly lower in the C-arm group (462 vs 102 mGy; P = 0.0013). This study suggested that the accuracy of PPS placement and time to confirm the PPS angle are the advantages in a hybrid OR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kageyama, H., Yoshimura, S., Uchida, K., & Iida, T. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of multi-axis intraoperative angiography unit for percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 57(9), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free