Evaluation of marginal adaptation at interfaces using composite resin to different setting amalgam filling in class ii cavity preparation

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the microleakage of composite restorations alone or with amalgam base in proximal box of class Ⅱ cavity preparation. Method: Eighty proximal cavities (Mesio-occlusal and disto-occlusal) were prepared in 40 premolars with carbide bur and randomly divided into four groups. Group A restored with composite resin; the other three groups restored with combined amalgam-composite restoration as follows. Group B the composite inserted immediately after insertion of amalgam, group C the composite inserted after 5 minutes of amalgam insertion while in group D the composite inserted after two days of amalgam insertion. Marginal adaptation was evaluated at the following interfaces: tooth-amalgam(T-A), tooth-composite resin (T-C) and amalgam-composite (A-C). Microleakage was evaluated by means of methylene blue infiltration after 21 days water storage and thermocycling aging. Microleakage was assessed by measuring the depth of horizontal dye penetration. Image J analysis software was used to measure the penetration of dye in the tooth-filling interface and in the amalgam-composite interface. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey HSD tests (α =0.05) were used statistically for analyzing gather data. Results: There were a significant statically showed by ANOVA test between teeth-fillings interface, according to Tukey’s test there were a significant difference between teeth-composite interface and teeth-amalgam interface (p<0.05), while between composite-amalgam interface, ANOVA test showed a significant difference between groups and Tukey’s test showed a significant difference between groups according to time of placement of composite on amalgam filling (p<0.05). Conclusion: Using of amalgam at the cervical base of the box in Class II combined amalgam-composite restoration has better result than using of composite from marginal leakage view.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gholam, M. K., Shukri, B. M. S., & Jasim, H. H. (2021). Evaluation of marginal adaptation at interfaces using composite resin to different setting amalgam filling in class ii cavity preparation. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 15(1), 2575–2580. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13787

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free