Life-Cycle Assessment Comparison for Long-Span Cable and Truss Structural Systems: Case Study

  • Trussoni M
  • Simatic E
  • Raebel C
  • et al.
7Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29% reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1% reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trussoni, M., Simatic, E., Raebel, C. H., & Huttelmaier, H. P. (2015). Life-Cycle Assessment Comparison for Long-Span Cable and Truss Structural Systems: Case Study. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free