The false discovery rate for statistical pattern recognition

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The false discovery rate (FDR) and false nondiscovery rate (FNDR) have received considerable attention in the literature on multiple testing. These performance measures are also appropriate for classification, and in this work we develop generalization error analyses for FDR and FNDR when learning a classifier from labeled training data. Unlike more conventional classification performance measures, the empirical FDR and FNDR are not binomial random variables but rather a ratio of binomials, which introduces challenges not present in conventional formulations of the classification problem. We develop distribution-free uniform deviation bounds and apply these to obtain finite sample bounds and strong universal consistency. We also present a simulation study demonstrating the merits of variance-based bounds, which we also develop. In the context of multiple testing with FDR/FNDR, our framework may be viewed as a way to leverage training data to achieve distribution free, asymptotically optimal inference under the random effects model. © 2009, Institute of Mathematical Statistics. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott, C., Bellala, G., & Willett, R. (2009). The false discovery rate for statistical pattern recognition. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 3, 651–677. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-EJS363

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free