Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures

38Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Brush cytology is the initial intervention when evaluating biliary strictures. Biliary brush cytology is known for its low sensitivity (but high specificity) and may be accompanied by biopsies and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to improve diagnostic yield. This study aimed to identify features to enhance cytological sensitivity, and assess which sampling method(s) improve identification of pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas (PBCa). METHODS Seventy-three biliary stricture cases were retrieved (38 PBCa and 35 control benign strictures). Biliary brushings, FISH, and biopsies were reviewed. Cytology specimens were evaluated for cellularity and presence of drunken honeycomb (DH), loosely cohesive clusters of round cells (LCCRC), large atypical cells with foamy cytoplasm (LACF), and single vacuolated malignant cells (SCs). Biopsies were examined for the presence of stromal invasion (SI). RESULTS Biliary brushings were scantly cellular in 47.4% of PBCa and 51.4% of controls, resulting in 69.6% nondiagnostic/false-negative cytology diagnoses. DH, LACF, and SCs were significantly associated with adenocarcinoma (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salomao, M., Gonda, T. A., Margolskee, E., Eguia, V., Remotti, H., Poneros, J. M., … Saqi, A. (2015). Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures. Cancer Cytopathology, 123(4), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21509

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free