Investigation into complementary and integrative medicine practitioners' clinical experience of intestinal permeability: A cross-sectional survey

7Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This study aims to explore the conditions complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) practitioners associate with increased intestinal permeability (IP) and the methods they employ to assess IP. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of naturopaths, nutritionists and Western herbal medicine practitioners was undertaken (n = 227) through the Practitioner Research and Collaboration Initiative (PRACI) network. Results: CIM practitioners (n = 36, response rate 15.9%) associate IP with gastrointestinal (100.0%), autoimmune (91.7%), skin (91.7%), neurological (80.6%), respiratory (55.6%) and liver-related conditions (44.4%). CIM practitioners frequently treat IP (72.7%); observing a minimum 3 months of treatment is required to resolve IP. Patient's signs and symptoms were the main reasons CIM practitioners suspected IP (94.1%). Conclusion: CIM practitioners observe a clinical link between IP and a wide range of conditions, including those not yet recognised within the literature. The clinical experience of CIM practitioners holds substantial value to the advancement of research and the clinical management of IP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leech, B., Schloss, J., & Steel, A. (2018). Investigation into complementary and integrative medicine practitioners’ clinical experience of intestinal permeability: A cross-sectional survey. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 31, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.02.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free