Diagnostic accuracy of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) and wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive mac-2-binding protein (WFA+-M2BP) in patients with chronic liver disease

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The present study assessed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of elastography (acoustic radiation force impulse, ARFI) with that of Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein (WFA+-M2BP) for estimating the stage of hepatic fibrosis in chronic liver disease patients. Material/Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled 70 chronic liver disease patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatic tumors. ARFI and WFA+-M2BP serum level, underlying liver disease, and laboratory data for all patients were recorded. The stage of fibrosis was determined from a surgical specimen. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) was measured to compare the diagnostic accuracy. Results: The ARFI and serum WFA+-M2BP levels had good performances for detecting severe fibrosis (3F3). The AUC in characterization of fibrosis stage 3F3 was 0.79 for ARFI and 0.71 for serum WFA+-M2BP levels. When comparing the diagnostic performances between ARFI and serum WFA+-M2BP levels for the severity of fibrosis stage, no significant differences were found. Then all patients were divided into 2 subgroups, the AUC for serum WFA+-M2BP levels was higher in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) subgroup than in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) subgroup when characterizing fibrosis stages 3F3. Conclusions: WFA+-M2BP is an accurate biomarker and is as good as ARFI in detecting severe fibrosis for chronic liver disease patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, C. C., Hsu, H. T., Chen, Y. L., Chen, R. C., Wu, W. P., & Chou, C. T. (2019). Diagnostic accuracy of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) and wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive mac-2-binding protein (WFA+-M2BP) in patients with chronic liver disease. Medical Science Monitor, 25, 7169–7174. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.916533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free