Comparative evaluation of biomass power generation systems in China using hybrid life cycle inventory analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There has been a rapid growth in using agricultural residues as an energy source to generate electricity in China. Biomass power generation (BPG) systems may vary significantly in technology, scale, and feedstock and consequently in their performances. A comparative evaluation of five typical BPG systems has been conducted in this study through a hybrid life cycle inventory (LCI) approach. Results show that requirements of fossil energy savings, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions, as well as emission reductions of SO2 and NO x, can be best met by the BPG systems. The cofiring systems were found to behave better than the biomass-only fired system and the biomass gasification systems in terms of energy savings and GHG emission reductions. Comparing with results of conventional process-base LCI, an important aspect to note is the significant contribution of infrastructure, equipment, and maintenance of the plant, which require the input of various types of materials, fuels, services, and the consequent GHG emissions. The results demonstrate characteristics and differences of BPG systems and help identify critical opportunities for biomass power development in China.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, H., Yin, X., & Wu, C. (2014). Comparative evaluation of biomass power generation systems in China using hybrid life cycle inventory analysis. Scientific World Journal, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/735431

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free