Serum metabolites as predictive molecular markers of ovarian response to controlled stimulation: A pilot study

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to look into the use of serum metabolites as potential biomarkers of response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Methods: This case-control study analyzed serum samples from 30 patients aged <36 years undergoing COS for ICSI in a university-affiliated assisted reproduction center from January 2017 to August 2017. The samples were split into three groups based on response to COS as follows: poor responders: <4 retrieved oocytes (PR group, n=10); normal responders: ≥8 and ≤12 retrieved oocytes (NR group, n=10); and hyper-responders: >25 retrieved oocytes (HR, n=10). The metabolic profiles of the serum samples were compared between the groups through Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were built to assess the power of the model at predicting response to COS. Results: PCA clearly distinguished between PR, NR and HR, and 10 ions were chosen as potential biomarkers of response to COS. These ions were more specific for PR than for NR. The ROC curve considering PR and NR had an area under the curve of 99.6% (95% CI: 88.9-100%). Conclusion: The preliminary evidence discussed in this study suggests that serum metabolites may be used as predictive molecular markers of ovarian response to controlled stimulation. The integration of clinical and “omics” findings may allow the migration toward an era of personalized treatment in reproductive medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borges, E., Montani, D. A., Setti, A. S., Zanetti, B. F., Figueira, R. de C. S., Iaconelli, A., … Braga, D. P. de A. F. (2019). Serum metabolites as predictive molecular markers of ovarian response to controlled stimulation: A pilot study. Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida, 23(4), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free