The Fourth Generation of Human Rights: Epistemic Rights in Digital Lifeworlds

19Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In contrast to China's efforts to upgrade its system of governance around a stupefying amount of data collection and electronic scoring, countries committed to democracy and human rights did not upgrade their systems. Instead, those countries ended up with surveillance capitalism. It is vital for the survival of those ideas about governance to perform such an upgrade. This paper aims to contribute to that goal. I propose a framework of epistemic actorhood in terms of four roles and characterize digital lifeworlds and what matters about them both in terms of how they fit in with Max Tegmark's distinctions among stages of life and in terms of how they generate their own episteme, the data episteme, with its immense possibilities of infopower (a term inspired by Foucault). Epistemic rights that strengthen existing human rights - as part of a fourth generation of rights - are needed to protect epistemic actorhood in those roles. In the long run, we might well need a new kind of right, the right to the exercise of genuinely human intelligence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Risse, M. (2021). The Fourth Generation of Human Rights: Epistemic Rights in Digital Lifeworlds. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 8(2), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free