Abstract
Background: This phase II study investigated whether a lower-than-approved dose of capecitabine, plus docetaxel (XT), would improve tolerability versus standard-dose XT without compromising efficacy. Patients and methods: Women aged ≥18 years with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the (neo)adjuvant, first- or second-line metastatic setting were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard-dose XT (capecitabine 1250 mg/m. 2 twice daily, days 1-14; docetaxel 75 mg/m. 2, day 1 every 3 weeks) or low-dose XT (capecitabine 825 mg/m. 2 twice daily, days 1-14; docetaxel as above). The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of low-dose to standard-dose XT in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 470 patients were randomly allocated in a 1 1 ratio to standard-dose or low-dose XT. Median PFS was 7.9 versus 5.8 months [hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.43] in the standard-dose and low-dose arms, respectively. The upper limit of the 95% CI was above the predefined non-inferiority margin (1.35, P = 0.078). Secondary efficacy end points were consistent with PFS. The frequency and severity of adverse events was similar in both treatment arms. Conclusions: Non-inferiority of low-dose to standard-dose XT in terms of PFS was not demonstrated; this may be due to regional subgroup effects. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Buzdar, A. U., Xu, B., Digumarti, R., Goedhals, L., Hu, X., Semiglazov, V., … Tjulandin, S. (2012). Randomized phase II non-inferiority study (no16853) of two different doses of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel for locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Annals of Oncology, 23(3), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr256
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.