Association Between Financial Distress with Patient and Caregiver Outcomes in Home-Based Palliative Care: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial

10Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Serious illness often causes financial hardship for patients and families. Home-based palliative care (HBPC) may partly address this. Objective: Describe the prevalence and characteristics of patients and family caregivers with high financial distress at HBPC admission and examine the relationship between financial distress and patient and caregiver outcomes. Design, Settings, and Participants: Data for this cohort study were drawn from a pragmatic comparative-effectiveness trial testing two models of HBPC in Kaiser Permanente. We included 779 patients and 438 caregivers from January 2019 to January 2020. Measurements: Financial distress at admission to HBPC was measured using a global question (0–10-point scale: none=0; mild=1–5; moderate/severe=6+). Patient- (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, distress thermometer, PROMIS-10) and caregiver (Preparedness for Caregiving, Zarit-12 Burden, PROMIS-10)-reported outcomes were measured at baseline and 1 month. Hospital utilization was captured using electronic medical records and claims. Mixed-effects adjusted models assessed survey measures and a proportional hazard competing risk model assessed hospital utilization. Results: Half of the patients reported some level of financial distress with younger patients more likely to have moderate/severe financial distress. Patients with moderate/severe financial distress at HBPC admission reported worse symptoms, general distress, and quality of life (QoL), and caregivers reported worse preparedness, burden, and QoL (all, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, S. E., Haupt, E. C., Nau, C., Werch, H., McMullen, C., Lynn, J., … Nguyen, H. Q. (2022). Association Between Financial Distress with Patient and Caregiver Outcomes in Home-Based Palliative Care: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(12), 3029–3037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07286-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free