The ethics of good communication in a complex research partnership

6Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The tripartite partnership among Morehouse School of Medicine, Tuskegee University, and University of Alabama at Birmingham is complex. In 2005, the three schools-with different institutional cultures, characters, and resources-agreed to collaborate in efforts to eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in cancer burdens. Pursuing this laudable aim predictably involved some miscommunication. The Bioethics Shared Resource (BSR) group foresaw such challenges and monitored interactions to prevent harm, noting that while effective communication is critical to the achievement of mutual goals, an understanding and prudent use of proven communication principles is a sine qua non for success. In this commentary, we share the undergirding moral concepts, communication approaches, and lessons learned. This experience has led us to propose an ethics of good communication for others to consider.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sodeke, S., Turner, T., & Tarver, W. (2010). The ethics of good communication in a complex research partnership. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(SUPPL. 3), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0356

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free