The mouse as a model for the study of penile erection: Moving towards a smaller animal

13Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We evaluated erectile haemodynamics in mice and characterized the corpus cavernosum morphologically. Four-month-old male BALB/c mice and Sprague-Dawley rats were used. The following stimulation parameters were tested to achieve maximal erectile responses: voltage, 1-6 V; frequency, 6-24 Hz; pulse width, 1 msec; duration, 1 min (n = 7 per group). In a separate group of mice and rats (n = 10 per group), we measured systemic arterial pressure by use of either a 24-gauge angiocatheter or smaller calibre PE-10 tubing. Cavernous tissues from mice, rats or patients with psychogenic erectile dysfunction were stained for factor VIII, α-actin and Masson trichrome. Electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve in mice produced voltage-dependent erectile responses of up to 5 V, with the highest response at a frequency of 12 Hz. The maximal intracavernous pressure recorded at this stimulation parameter was comparable with that in rats. A PE-10 catheter was more reliable for measuring systemic arterial pressure in mice than was a 24-gauge angiocatheter, and the values recorded were similar between mice and rats. The content of endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and collagen was similar between mice and rats. However, the cavernous tissue of both animals contained lesser amounts of smooth muscle cells and greater amounts of collagen than that of humans (p < 0.01). These results suggest that the mouse is a useful and technically feasible model for the study of penile erection and has functional and structural properties similar to those of rats. © 2007 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piao, S., Ryu, J. K., Shin, H. Y., Han, J. Y., Lee, H. S., & Suh, J. K. (2007). The mouse as a model for the study of penile erection: Moving towards a smaller animal. International Journal of Andrology, 30(5), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00737.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free