A review of proximal inputs to the near response

16Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Maddox proposed that the perceived nearness of a target could influence the ocular vergence response. Proximal inputs have been used to refer to all static and dynamic cues to depth other than disparity and blur. In this paper, we review a number of studies in which proximal influences have been assessed. While general agreement exists that proximal contributions are significant when blur and disparity cues are absent (open-loop conditions), there are conflicting reports on the role of proximal vergence and accommodation under closed-loop conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fogt, N., Toole, A. J., & Rogers, D. L. (2016, January 1). A review of proximal inputs to the near response. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12301

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free