Running velocity at the ventilatory threshold and at VO2max before and after the eight-week cardiovascular endurance training

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to compare changes in running velocity at ventilatory threshold with the veliocity at VO2max, before and after the eight-week exercise program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 32 male subjects (age: 22.3 +/- 2.5 years, height: 179.8 +/- 7.6 cm, body mass: 76.8 +/- 9.0 kg) performed a progressive test for ventilatory threshold (VT) measurement and VO2max on treadmill. After 8 weeks of endurance training (3 times per week, 30 to 70 min, in different zones in respect to the ventilatory threshold) the performed the same test. RESULTS: Running velocity at ventilatory threshold increased significantly (p = 0.0001), between initial and final measurements (10.88 +/- 2.09, 12.94 +/- 1.90 km/h, respectively); as well as at VO2max (14.63 +/- 1.86, 16.44 +/- 1.59 km/h, respectively). At the initial test, velocity at ventilatory threshold was 74.11 % of VO2max. At the final test, velocity at ventilatory threshold was 78.43% of VO2max. Running velocity at ventilatory threshold has significantly increased at final test (p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: Running velocity at ventilatory threshold has significantly increased after eight weeks of endurance training (p = 0.001), when expressed in absolute values and percentage of velocity at VO2max. CONCLUSION: Comparison between the initial and final test demonstrated a significant increase of observed variables, under experimental conditions: at final test running velocity has increased at ventilatory threshold, in respect to absolute values and expressed as percentage at VO2max.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stojiljković, S., Mazić, S., Nesić, D., Velkovski, S., & Mitrović, D. (2005). Running velocity at the ventilatory threshold and at VO2max before and after the eight-week cardiovascular endurance training. Medicinski Pregled, 58(1–2), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS0502027S

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free