Bioethics in Medical Care Rationing During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic

2Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus (CoV) disease (COVID)-19 poses difficult situations in which the ethical course of action is not clear, or choices are made between equally unacceptable responses. METHODS: A web search was performed using the terms "bioethics; COVID-19; ethics; severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2; emergent care; pandemic; and public health emergencies." RESULTS: Protection from COVID-19 has resulted in the cancellation of necessary medical interventions, lengthened suffering, and potential non-COVID-19 deaths. Prolonged lockdown reduced well-being, triggering or aggravating mental illnesses and violence, and escalated medical risks. Collateral damage includes restrictions on visitations to hospitals, alienation from the deceased relative, or lack of warm caring of patients. Finally, in a public health crisis, public health interest overrides individual rights if it results in severe harm to the community. CONCLUSION: Balancing ethical dilemmas are one more challenge in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

González-Duarte, A., Kaufer-Horwitz, M., Gamba, G., Rivera-Moscoso, R., & Aguilar-Salinas, C. A. (2020). Bioethics in Medical Care Rationing During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic. Revista de Investigacion Clinica; Organo Del Hospital de Enfermedades de La Nutricion, 73(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.20000385

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free