Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Despite frequent use, stereotactic head frames require manual coordinate calculations and manual frame settings that are associated with human error. This study examines freestanding robot-assisted navigation (RAN) as a means to reduce the drawbacks of traditional cranial stereotaxy and improve targeting accuracy.METHODS:Seven cadaveric human torsos with heads were tested with 8 anatomic coordinates selected for lead placement mirrored in each hemisphere. Right and left hemispheres of the brain were randomly assigned to either the traditional stereotactic arc-based (ARC) group or the RAN group. Both target accuracy and trajectory accuracy were measured. Procedural time and the radiation required for registration were also measured.RESULTS:The accuracy of the RAN group was significantly greater than that of the ARC group in both target (1.2 ± 0.5 mm vs 1.7 ± 1.2 mm, P =.005) and trajectory (0.9 ± 0.6 mm vs 1.3 ± 0.9 mm, P =.004) measurements. Total procedural time was also significantly faster for the RAN group than for the ARC group (44.6 ± 7.7 minutes vs 86.0 ± 12.5 minutes, P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Anderson, W., Ponce, F. A., Kinsman, M. J., Sani, S., Hwang, B., Ghinda, D., … Bucklen, B. S. (2024). Robotic-Assisted Navigation for Stereotactic Neurosurgery: A Cadaveric Investigation of Accuracy, Time, and Radiation. Operative Neurosurgery, 26(5), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001024
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.