Postmodernism, Language, and Textuality Part l

  • Silverman H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

postmodernist thinking enframes, circumscribes, and delimits modernist thinking, then where are the places in which modernism in philosophy comes to an end? This closure occurs in many places and in many different ways. Postmodernism enframes modernism without identity or unity. It is fragmented, discontinuous, multiple, and dispersed. Where modernism asserts the centering, focusing, continuity—once the break with tradition has already occurred—postmodernism decenters, enframes, discontinues, and fragments the prevalence of modernist ideals. But this self-delimitation does not occur all at once. Indeed, the coordinate philosophical practices of the early twentieth century reaffirm, reconstruct, and then set the stage for their own self-circumscription. The determination of the ends of metaphysics and the paths of thinking is also the framework for the closure of modernism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silverman, H. J. (1986). Postmodernism, Language, and Textuality Part l. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandp15002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free