A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia’s KPK and Hong Kong ICAC in Eradicating Corruption

  • Arifin R
  • Rodiyah R
  • Puspita F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article seeks to discusses anti-corruption policies in Indonesia and Hong Kong. This research arises from the phenomenon of corruption that has become widespread in Indonesia and seems to be a never-endingproblem that has caused great damage in all sectors of life. It's not only a matter of how much the state loss or corrupt modus operandi that is even more sophisticated and even makes Indonesia one of the highest-rankingcountries in corruption cases, but it is also a matter of law enforcement whihch is less smart in handling corruption cases themselves. On the other hand, reportedly having a different approach in combating corruption, Hong Kong is considered to have been successful in carrying out its duties. With comparative study, this article will elaborate various patterns of work conducted by anti-corruption institutions in Indonesia and Hong Kong, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arifin, R., Rodiyah, R., & Puspita, F. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia’s KPK and Hong Kong ICAC in Eradicating Corruption. Jambe Law Journal, 2(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.2.2.163-179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free