How Reliable Is the Intraoperative Computed Tomography Angiography in Assessing Complete Surgical Resection of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations?

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is still considered the gold standard test to evaluate arteriovenous malformation's (AVM) residual after microsurgical resection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and reliability of intraoperative computed tomography angiography (iCTA) as an immediate method of evaluating the surgical results of AVM resection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review for all cases of cerebral AVMs at our institute from January 2015 to April 2020 who underwent surgical resection of cerebral AVM and had iCTA. All included patients underwent a postoperative DSA, and the results were compared with iCTA. RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases were included. All cases showed complete resection (100%) in the iCTA, and the results were consistent with the postoperative DSA results. The sensitivity of iCTA was 100%. The added operative time ranged from 25 to 30 min. There were no complications related to the use of iCTA. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative assessment of AVMs surgical results with an iCTA is safe and reliable. The sensitivity of iCTA following AVM resection merits further investigations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alotaibi, F. S., Ntyl, S. R., Almuhaini, T. S., Bin Abdulqader, S., Alotaibi, N. M., Soulami, L., … Alobaid, A. (2021). How Reliable Is the Intraoperative Computed Tomography Angiography in Assessing Complete Surgical Resection of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations? Operative Neurosurgery, 21(6), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free