Differentiation between mechanically loose and fixed press-fit implants using quantitative acoustics and load self-referencing: A phantom study on shoulder prostheses in polyurethane foam

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study proposes to use cross-interface quantitative acoustics (ci-qA) and load selfreferencing (LSR) to assess implant stability in a radiation-free, inexpensive, rapid, and quantitative manner. Eight bone analog specimens, made from polyurethane foam, were implanted with a cementless stemless shoulder implant-first in a fixed and later in a loose configuration-and measured using ci-qA under two load conditions. The loose implants exhibited higher micromotion and lower pull-out strength than their stable counterparts, with all values falling within the range of reported reference values. All acoustic characteristics differentiated between loose and fixed implants (maximum area-under-curve AUC = 1.0 for mean total signal energy, AUC = 1.0 for mean total signal energy ratio, AUC = 0.8 for harmonic ratio, and AUC = 0.92 for load self-referencing coefficient). While these results on bone substitute material will need to be confirmed on real bone specimen, ci-qA could ultimately facilitate the assessment of primary stability during implantation surgery and avoid unnecessary revision through quantitative evaluation of secondary stability during follow-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vogl, F., Greger, S., Favre, P., Taylor, W. R., & Thistlethwaite, P. (2020). Differentiation between mechanically loose and fixed press-fit implants using quantitative acoustics and load self-referencing: A phantom study on shoulder prostheses in polyurethane foam. PLoS ONE, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233548

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free