Industrial policy and complexity economics

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mainstream theory underlying industrial policy highlights the neoclassical and structuralist approaches. The discussion on structuralist theories readily segues to complexity economics where industrial policy foments structural transformation by creating reinforcing feedback loops, particularly among manufacturing, exports, and investment. Empirical evidence is provided by applying panel cointegration analysis to investigate coevolution patterns among the following variables: investment-GDP ratio, exports-GDP ratio and manufacturing-GDP ratio. Econometric estimates show that there is indeed a long-run relationship that is bidirectional among the three variables. However, this is only a necessary condition for reinforcing feedback loops to materialize. Idiosyncratic factors in each country determine whether industrial policy has led to growth-oriented feedback loops. In the Philippines, despite interventions to boost manufacturing, no growth-oriented loop was established because of inadequate investment, particularly in infrastructure. Moreover, exports were hampered by the poor record in latching on to regional production networks. The Republic of Korea has had more success than Malaysia because it strengthened its innovation system. The missing link in Malaysia is own-technology creation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yap, J. T., & Turla, J. F. M. (2024). Industrial policy and complexity economics. Philippine Review of Economics, 61(2), 24–52. https://doi.org/10.37907/3ERP4202D

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free