Abstract
This paper explores the economic role credit rating agencies play in the corporate bond market. We consider three existing theories about multiple ratings: information production, rating shopping, and regulatory certification. Using differences in rating composition, default prediction, and credit spread changes, our evidence only supports regulatory certification. Marginal, additional credit ratings are more likely to occur because of, and seem to matter primarily for, regulatory purposes. They do not seem to provide significant additional information related to credit quality. © 2012 the American Finance Association.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bongaerts, D., Cremers, K. J. M., & Goetzmann, W. N. (2012). Tiebreaker: Certification and multiple credit ratings. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 113–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01709.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.