Recovery after electroconvulsive therapy: Comparison of propofol with methohexitone anaesthesia

19Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have studied prospectively 39 patients receiving a course of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depressive disorder; they were allocated randomly to receive either propofol or methohexitone for anaesthesia. Recovery after the third ECT treatment was assessed by finger tap and digit symbol substitution tests at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after induction. Seizure duration (median (interquartile range)) was shorter with propofol (24 (10)s) than methohexitone (29 (17)s) (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in psychometric recovery for drug type, duration of the seizure or initial severity of depression. These results suggest that the more rapid recovery rates noted with propofol in other procedures are not evident after electrically induced seizures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matters, R. M., Beckett, W. G., Kirkby, K. C., & King, T. E. (1995). Recovery after electroconvulsive therapy: Comparison of propofol with methohexitone anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 75(3), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/75.3.297

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free