Human IgG1, IgG3, and IgG3 hinge-truncated mutants show different protection capabilities against meningococci depending on the target antigen and epitope specificity

39Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the bactericidal activity of recombinant sets of chimeric IgG monoclonal antibodies against two important outer membrane meningococcal vaccine antigens: PorA and factor H binding protein (FHbp). The sets contained human Fc portions from IgG1, IgG3, and two IgG3 mutants (IgG3m15 and IgGm17) with hinge regions of 15 and 17 amino acids encoded by hinge exons h2 and h1, respectively (human IgG3 has a hinge region of 62 amino acids encoded by hinge exons h1, h2, h3, and h4, while human IgG1 has a hinge region of only 15 amino acids encoded by one hinge exon) and mouse V regions. IgG1 showed higher bactericidal activity than IgG3 when directed against PorA (an abundant antigen), while IgG3 was more bactericidal than IgG1 when directed against FHbp (a sparsely and variably distributed antigen). On the other hand, the IgG3 hinge-truncated antibodies IgG3m15 and IgGm17 showed higher bactericidal activity than both IgG1 and IgG3 regardless of the target antigen. Thus, the Fc region of IgG3 antibodies appears to have an enhanced complement-activating function, independent of their long hinge region, compared to IgG1 antibodies. The greater activity of the truncated IgG3 hinge mutants indicates that the long hinge of IgG3 seems to downregulate through an unknown mechanism the inherent increased complement-activating capability of IgG3 Fc when the antibody binds to a sparse antigen.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giuntini, S., Granoff, D. M., Beernink, P. T., Ihle, O., Bratlie, D., & Michaelsen, T. E. (2016). Human IgG1, IgG3, and IgG3 hinge-truncated mutants show different protection capabilities against meningococci depending on the target antigen and epitope specificity. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 23(8), 698–706. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00193-16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free