Smartphone-delivered approach bias modification for reducing harmful drinking amongst middle–older age adults: Secondary analyses of a single-arm pilot study

Abstract

Introduction: Novel, scalable, low-cost interventions are needed to reduce harmful drinking amongst middle–older adults. Approach bias modification (ApBM) is a promising form of cognitive training for preventing/reducing alcohol use that can be delivered via smartphone. This study explored the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of smartphone delivered and personalised ApBM amongst Australians ≥55 years, an age cohort at risk of alcohol-related harms. Methods: Secondary analyses in a middle–older adult subsample (≥55 years, n = 289) of an open-label pilot study using a retrospective, repeated measures design. We explored acceptability (adherence, user mobile acceptability ratings, free-text responses) and preliminary effectiveness (changes in drinking quantity and frequency, craving, dependence and proportion drinking within government-recommended guidelines) of two sessions/week over 4 weeks of evidence-based ApBM training, adapted to include personalisation and smartphone delivery amongst Australians ≥55 years. Results: Although minor adaptations to training were suggested, the intervention was acceptable amongst survey completers, with 72% training adherence. Relative to baseline, there was a significant increase in the proportion of drinking within recommended single-session and weekly guidelines post-training (from 25% to 41% and 6% to 28%, respectively, p < 0.001), with past-week standard drinks significantly decreasing by 18% (p < 0.001) and significant reductions in drinking days, mean craving and dependence scores (p < 0.001). Discussion and Conclusions: Findings suggest smartphone ApBM is acceptable amongst middle-to-older aged Australians and may support this ‘at risk’ cohort to remain within government-recommended alcohol consumption guidelines to optimise healthy aging, although, in the context of a single-arm study, preliminary results should be interpreted cautiously.