Correction to: Big Surprises: Jackpot Reinforcers in Research and Practice

  • Lattal K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reports an error in "Big surprises: Jackpot reinforcers in research and practice" by Kennon A. Lattal ( Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2020[Dec], Vol 13[4], 1000-1008). The original article was updated to correct errors in the Article Note that were introduced by the Publisher. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record [rid]2020-86892-001[/rid]). Unusually large, infrequent reinforcers, described as jackpots, are the subject of considerable discussion among applied animal behaviorists. Such reinforcers offer considerable promise in applied behavior analysis as a means of both potentiating training of new responses and response classes and enhancing previously learned ones. The concept of jackpot reinforcement, however, is rife with not only a lack of definitional and procedural clarity but also a paucity of research, either basic or applied, on such reinforcement. Considerations in undertaking such research include defining the parameters of jackpot reinforcers, identifying suitable dependent variables, and creating experimental designs appropriate for their assessment. The few experimental analyses of jackpot reinforcer effects on either response acquisition or maintenance have produced little evidence of systematic effects, despite the use of several different methods and behavioral measures. Negative results could reflect either the absence of systematic effects of these jackpot reinforcers or unsuitable methods of analysis. Only further research will take the topic of jackpot reinforcers beyond opinion and testimonial and into the realm of the science of behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lattal, K. A. (2021). Correction to: Big Surprises: Jackpot Reinforcers in Research and Practice. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(1), 292–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00532-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free