Comparison of 51cr edta clearance with formulae in the measurement of glomerular filtration rate

13Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The need exists for a fast and accurate method of estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). A number of nomograms and formulae which estimate GFR on the basis of a plasma creatinine level have appeared in the literature. We examined some of these nomograms and formulae and showed that when the formula published by Cockcroft and Gault was compared with the GFR as estimated by 51Cr EDTA clearance, the coefficient of correlation was better than 0.94. We also compared creatinine clearance with the Cockcroft and Gault formula, and the Siersbaek-Nielsen nomogram. In each case, the correlation coefficient was less than that for the Cockcroft and Gault-51Cr EDTA comparison. Because of the inherent difficulties in making accurate 24 h urine collections, and problems associated with 51Cr EDTA studies, it is suggested that the formula prediction of GFR is more reliable than a GFR estimate using a 24 h collection. © 1986 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinton, T. J., De Leacy, E. A., & Cowley, D. M. (1986). Comparison of 51cr edta clearance with formulae in the measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Pathology, 18(4), 445–447. https://doi.org/10.3109/00313028609087566

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free