Abstract
Drawing on earlier work of the author that is both clarified and amplified here, this article explores the question: what is it for two or more people to intend to do something in the future? In short, what is it for people to share an intention? It argues for three criteria of adequacy for an account of shared intention (the disjunction, concurrence, and obligation criteria) and offers an account that satisfies them. According to this account, in technical terms explained in the paper, people share an intention when and only when they are jointly committed to intend as a body to do such-and-such in the future. This account is compared and contrasted with the common approach that treats shared intention as a matter of the correlative personal intentions, with particular reference to the work of Michael Bratman.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gilbert, M. (2008). Two Approaches to Shared Intention: An Essay in the Philosophy of Social Phenomena. Analyse & Kritik, 30(2), 483–514. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2008-0208
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.