Abstract
Objective The study objective was to determine whether the extracardiac conduit Fontan confers an arrhythmia advantage over the intracardiac lateral tunnel Fontan. Methods This multicenter study of 1271 patients compared bradyarrhythmia (defined as need for pacing) and tachyarrhythmia (defined as needing antiarrhythmic therapy) between 602 patients undergoing the intracardiac Fontan and 669 patients undergoing the extracardiac Fontan. The median age at the time of the Fontan procedure was 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.6-3.2 years) for the intracardiac group and 3.0 years (interquartile range, 2.4-3.9) for the extracardiac group (P <30 days) bradyarrhythmia occurred in 24 patients (4%) in the intracardiac group and 73 patients (11%) in the extracardiac group (P <30 days) tachyarrhythmia occurred in 32 patients (5%) in the intracardiac group and 53 patients (8%) in the extracardiac group (P = not significant). Late (>30 days) bradyarrhythmia occurred in 105 patients (18%) in the intracardiac group and 63 patients (9%) in the extracardiac group (P 30 days) tachyarrhythmia occurred in 58 patients (10%) in the intracardiac group and 23 patients (3%) in the extracardiac group (P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Balaji, S., Daga, A., Bradley, D. J., Etheridge, S. P., Law, I. H., Batra, A. S., … Shah, M. (2014). An international multicenter study comparing arrhythmia prevalence between the intracardiac lateral tunnel and the extracardiac conduit type of Fontan operations. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 148(2), 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.070
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.