A re-appraisal of the normal cut-off assignment for anticardiolipin IgM tests

19Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Recent reports show an apparent large number of individuals with low to moderate titers of anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA), particularly of the IgM isotype with no clinical signs of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The significance of these results is unknown. This study examined the prevalence of low positive titers of IgM ACA antibodies in a large number (n = 982) of normal blood donors (Group 1) and in a group of 159 individuals > 60 years of age (Group 2). The effect of re-defining the currently used cut-off values for the IgM ACA tests was also examined. Methods: IgM ACA antibodies were tested in three ELISA assays: the Bindazyme™ Anti-IgM Cardiolipin EIA kit (assay A), an 'in-house' ACA test (assay B), and the APhL® ELISA kit (assay C). Results: Thenormal range cut-offs were re-calculated using the 95th percentile of the data for Group 1 (12.4 MPL U mL-1 for assay A, 5.4 MPL U mL-1 for assay B and 9.5 MPL U mL-1 for assay C) and Group 2 (9.9 MPL U mL-1 for assay A, 5.5 MPL U mL-1 for assay B and 13.2 MPL U mL-1 for assay C). These values were not significantly different from the current cut-off values for each assay. The prevalence of low positive results in Group 1 relative to the re-defined cut-off for that group were: 1.0%, 1.1% and 0.9% in assay A, B and C; and in Group 2: 0.6%, 0.6% and 0.6%, respectively. An indeterminate zone (between the 95th and 99th percentile) was then established for the two groups. The prevalence in Group 1 was 3.8%, 3.9% and 3.9% for assays A, B and C, respectively, and for Group 2: 4.4% in all three assays. Conclusions: The data confirm that the current cut-off point for each of the three assays is correct. We suggest based on this study that the low positive range is re-assigned 'indeterminate' and recommend that samples falling in this category should be retested to confirm positivity at a later date. © 2006 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budd, R., Harley, E., Quarshie, A., Henderson, V., Harris, E. N., & Pierangeli, S. S. (2006). A re-appraisal of the normal cut-off assignment for anticardiolipin IgM tests. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 4(10), 2210–2214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02134.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free