Measuring firing costs: The case for direct methods

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Firing costs, together with the legislative and regulatory frameworks governing employment relations, are often blamed for poor labour market outcomes. Yet, research on the economic impacts of these costs is inconclusive. There has been much focus on functional assumptions and the significance of parameters, but very little on the quality and precision of the cost measures upon which most results hinge. Reviewing the indirect and direct measurement methods commonly used, the author argues that direct quantitative methods, rarely used in research, are much needed to complement more popular indirect measures. A recent survey experiment conducted in Australia illustrates this point. Copyright © The author 2010 Journal compilation © International Labour Organization 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freyens, B. P. (2010). Measuring firing costs: The case for direct methods. International Labour Review, 149(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2010.00088.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free