Abstract
We report the in-vitro susceptibility of 27 clinical isolates of Scedosporium apiospermum and 43 of Scedosporium prolificans. S. apiospermum was resistant to fluconazole and flucytosine, with variable susceptibility to amphotericin B, itraconazole, ketoconazole and susceptible to miconazole. Voriconazole was much more active than fluconazole and flucytosine, more active than amphotericin B, itraconazole and ketoconazole and was as active as miconazole against S. apiospermum isolates. Voriconazole and the other six antifungal agents showed low activity against S. prolificans isolates.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cuenca-Estrella, M., Ruiz-Díez, B., Martínez-Suárez, J. V., Monzón, A., & Rodríguez-Tudela, J. L. (1999). Comparative in-vitro activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496) and six other antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Scedosporium prolificans and Scedosporium apiospermum. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 43(1), 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/43.1.149
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.