Insurance Discrimination, Companion Animal Harm, and Domestic Violence and Abuse — Double Jeopardy in the UK

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prompted by Signal et al.’s study, this research examines UK “Pet Insurance” policies to see if and how experiencing domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in interspecies households is excluded under insurance policies terms. Situating our findings within the existing literature on human and companion animal victims of DVA, we discuss the implications for improving cross-reporting and multi-agency action to protect and prevent harm to humans and companion animal victims of DVA. In turn we identify a series of recommendations to combat discrimination in insurance, set out in our conclusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turgoose, D., McKie, R. E., & Connelly, P. (2024). Insurance Discrimination, Companion Animal Harm, and Domestic Violence and Abuse — Double Jeopardy in the UK. Violence Against Women, 30(12–13), 3350–3371. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231176201

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free