Solving a weighty problem: Systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition interventions in severe mental illness{

167Citations
Citations of this article
255Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Nutrition interventions would appear fundamental for weight management and cardiometabolic risk reduction in people experiencing severe mental illness (SMI). Comprehensive evaluation of nutrition interventions is lacking. Aims To subject randomised controlled trials of nutrition interventions in people with SMI to systematic review and meta-analysis, and to measure anthropometric and biochemical parameters and nutritional intake. Method An electronic database search identified trials with nutrition intervention components. Trials were pooled for meta-analysis. Meta-regression analyses were performed on anthropometric moderators. Results Interventions led to significant weight loss (19 studies), reduced body mass index (17 studies), decreased waist circumference (10 studies) and lower blood glucose levels (5 studies). Dietitian-led interventions (6 studies) and studies delivered at antipsychotic initiation (4 studies) had larger effect sizes. Conclusions Evidence supports nutrition interventions as standard care in preventing and treating weight gain among people experiencing SMI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teasdale, S. B., Ward, P. B., Rosenbaum, S., Samaras, K., & Stubbs, B. (2017, February 1). Solving a weighty problem: Systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition interventions in severe mental illness{. British Journal of Psychiatry. Royal College of Psychiatrists. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.177139

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free