MAS Integration and Controllership Effectiveness: Evidence of a Preparer-User Perception Gap

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that managers establish a positive link between management accounting system (MAS) integration and controllership effectiveness, which is fully mediated by the perceived consistency of financial language. Our paper extends this research by analyzing whether controllers have similar perceptions on MAS design. Testing a series of multi-group structural equation models, we find evidence for a preparer-user perception gap with respect to the mediating impact of a consistent financial language. Our results contribute to the still-ongoing controversial debate on MAS integration by indicating that the effectiveness of MAS design cannot be evaluated solely from an instrumental perspective independent from users’ perceptions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weißenberger, B. E., Angelkort, H., & Holthoff, G. (2012). MAS Integration and Controllership Effectiveness: Evidence of a Preparer-User Perception Gap. Business Research, 5(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342735

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free