Impact of fasting in Ramadan in patients with cardiac disease

36Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether Ramadan fasting has any effect on patients with heart disease. Methods: We prospectively studied 465 outpatients with heart disease who were fasting during the month of Ramadan from October 24 to November 24, 2003. These studied subjects were from various medical centers in the Gulf region; State of Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain. We performed detailed clinical assessments one month before Ramadan, during Ramadan and one month after Ramadan and analyzed predictors of outcome. Results: Overall, the mean age was 55.9±11.3 years (age range 32-72). Of the 465 patients treated, 363 (78.1%) were males and 102 (21.9%) females. Among them, 119 (25.6%) patients had congestive heart failure, 288 (62%) patients with angina, 22 (4.7%) patients with atrial fibrillation and 11 (2.4%) patients with prosthetic metallic valves. Three hundred and seventy (79%) had prior myocardial infarction (MI), 195 (17.2%) had prior coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and 177 (38%) had prior percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). At the time of follow-up, we found that 91.2% could fast and only 6.7% felt worse while fasting in Ramadan. Of the studied subjects, 82.8% were compliant with cardiac medications and 68.8% were compliant with dietary instructions. We hospitalized 19 patients during Ramadan for cardiac reasons (unstable angina, worsening heart failure, MI, uncontrolled hypertension, subtherapeutic anticoagulation or arrhythmias). Conclusion: The effects of fasting during Ramadan on stable patients with cardiac disease are minimal. Most patients with stable cardiac disease can fast.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Suwaidi, J., Zubaid, M., Al-Mahmeed, W. A., Al-Rashdan, I., Amin, H., Bener, A., … Al-Binali, H. A. (2005). Impact of fasting in Ramadan in patients with cardiac disease. Saudi Medical Journal, 26(10), 1579–1583. https://doi.org/10.15537/1658-3175.3155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free