Comparative sectoral price elasticities of U.S. energy demand

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A sustainable energy system is key for addressing the world’s environmental and social challenges. The U.S is the second largest consumer of energy, with increased energy consumption in the previous half-century. To curb energy demand, it is essential to understand the relative price elasticities among the four main U.S energy consumption sectors; residential, industrial, commercial and transportation. The aim of this study is to present a theory-based comparative analysis of U.S sectoral energy price elasticities using the pooled mean group model. The speed of adjustment for the four sectors were −0.43, −0.41, −0.55 and −0.37, suggesting the existence of long-run relationships. The short-run own-price elasticities were −0.17, −0.39 and −0.27 for the commercial, industrial and residential sectors while the long-run own-price elasticities were −0.33, −0.45 and −0.20 for the commercial, residential and transportation sectors. We conclude that the residential sector readjusts to long-run equilibrium at a faster rate than the three other sectors. In the long run, this sector will yield a higher response to a price change. We suggest that price policies aimed at reducing energy demand should primarily target the residential sector, followed by the commercial and transportation sectors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Addey, K. A., Shaik, S., & Sakouvogui, K. (2019). Comparative sectoral price elasticities of U.S. energy demand. Cogent Economics and Finance, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1682743

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free