Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-off-care analyzers

39Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We evaluated the accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio (INR) on the CoaguChek S (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), CoaguChek XS (Roche Diagnostics), and i-STAT 1 (i-STAT, East Windsor, NJ) point-of-care (POC) analyzers compared with venous plasma INRs determined by a reference laboratory method. Overall agreement between POC and laboratory plasma INR was very good, with median bias between capillary whole blood and laboratory plasma INRs varying from 0.0 to -0.2 INR units on all devices. More than 90% of results on the CoaguChek XS and i-STAT 1 and 88% of CoaguChek S results were within 0.4 INR units of the reference laboratory method. The CoaguChek XS and i-STAT 1 demonstrated greater accuracy than the CoaguChek S as measured by the number of results that differed by more than 0.5 INR units from the reference method. Median bias between CoaguChek S capillary whole blood and laboratory plasma INRs changed over time, demonstrating the need for ongoing quality assurance measures for POC INR programs. ©American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karon, B. S., McBane, R. D., Chaudhry, R., Beyer, L. K., & Santrach, P. J. (2008). Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-off-care analyzers. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 130(1), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1309/DEK41W141Y0KRN8A

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free