Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the iliac arteries: Optimization by injection simulation

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Protocols for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the iliac arteries were optimized by computer simulations based on an impulse response function (IRF) of contrast agent (CA) concentration as a function of time obtained for 20 patients. Protocols with sequential, centric, and elliptical k-space coverage, different repetition rates (5 and 10 ms), and CA doses (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol/kg b.w.) were compared in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), distortion of vessel profiles, and sensitivity to timing errors. IRF-based simulations successfully characterized CA recirculation. Slow-rate CA infusions were found to achieve relatively high enhancement. In terms of SNR, there is no advantage in increasing the repetition rate. Distortion of vessel profiles is more likely in elliptic and centric k-space coverage. Protocols based on sequential k-space coverage and relatively long CA infusions proved to be particularly suited to large-FOV iliac examinations as they are relatively insensitive to timing errors. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmidt, M. A., Britten, A. J., Tomlinson, M. A., Vig, S., Powell, S., Cleminson, S., … Heron, C. W. (2001). Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the iliac arteries: Optimization by injection simulation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 46(2), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1199

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free