Abstract
Utilitarianism is often rejected on the grounds that it fails to respect the separateness of persons, instead treating people as mere "receptacles of value". I develop several different versions of this objection, and argue that, despite their prima facie plausibility, they are all mistaken. Although there are crude forms of utilitarianism that run afoul of these objections, I advance a new form of the view - 'token-pluralistic utilitarianism' - that does not.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Chappell, R. Y. (2015). Value receptacles. Nous, 49(2), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12023
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free